Eli Lilly v Canada[1] is the first final patent law decision in international investment arbitration brought under Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”). In this regard, it provides insight into likely approaches to future arbitrations seeking to challenge national jurisprudence under NAFTA or other trade agreements.

Continue Reading First in Class and Going Back to Basics – Eli Lilly v Canada NAFTA Dispute

The High Court of Delhi in India recently enforced an international arbitral award arising from the London Court of Arbitration between a Japanese and an Indian entity.  Both the size of the award and the court’s willingness to enforce it in India against an Indian corporation make this an important decision.

Continue Reading Indian Court Enforces $1.17B Billion USD Arbitral Award in Favour of Japanese Telecommunications Corporation

In Venezuela Holdings et al v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (“Venezuela Holdings”)[1] an ad hoc Committee for the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) nullified part of an arbitration award issued by an ICSID Tribunal that required the Government of Venezuela to pay $1.4 billion to certain subsidiaries of ExxonMobil (collectively, “ExxonMobil”). The arbitration award largely reflected compensation resulting from the nationalization one of ExxonMobil’s oilfield projects in 2007. However, on appeal the Committee held that the Tribunal erred in its approach to a price cap to compensation, which rendered the arbitral award a nullity. Venezuela Holdings, therefore, marks a victory for resource-rich governments and sends a cautionary note to foreign investors.

Continue Reading Watch your choice of law clause: the World Bank annuls a $1.4 billion damages award